🌊🤖Underwater Robotic Simulators - A Review

Analytics Literature Table Cite

This website accompanies the review “Underwater Robotic Simulators Review for Autonomous System Development”, offering a concise summary of findings and a categorized overview of the evaluated literature.


The review evaluates five state-of-the-art, ROS-compatible, open-source underwater robotic simulators (URSs) based on features such as sensor fidelity, environmental realism, and their role in sim-to-real transfer. Each simulator was analyzed across perception, planning, control, and other research domains.



🔍 SOTA Underwater Robotic Simulator Analytics

Foundational framework of an underwater robotic simulator
Figure 1: Research area distribution of publications that utilize the five reviewed simulator with the simulators' release years in parenthesis.

This figure illustrates how frequently each simulator—Stonefish, DAVE, HoloOcean, MARUS, and UNav-Sim—has been utilized across different underwater robotics research domains. The breakdown reveals that perception tasks dominate usage, especially for Stonefish and HoloOcean, reflecting the growing emphasis on sensing and data-driven models. Meanwhile, planning and control studies are also represented, though to a lesser extent, suggesting opportunities for further exploration using these simulators in decision-making and actuation-focused research.

It's notable that newer simulators like UNav-Sim, despite their recent release, are quickly gaining traction, showing the field’s responsiveness to new tools that offer enhanced realism and modern ROS2 compatibility. This trend also supports the case for benchmarking and standardization to unify future research efforts.

Timeline of underwater robotics simulators
Figure 2: Normalized citation distribution across five underwater robotic simulators (Stonefish, DAVE, HoloOcean, MARUS, and UNav-Sim), categorized by research domain. Each bar represents the proportion of citations attributed to perception, planning, and control-related studies for the respective simulator. This visualization highlights the varying focus of research efforts, with Stonefish and HoloOcean heavily cited for perception, while UNav-Sim shows a dominant presence in planning-related research.

📄 Literature Table

🖊️ BibTex

Pending